Johnston talks Captain America
...Johnston etc. GET IT.
Check out the full article here: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2010/02/captain-america-will-be-a-uso-performer-in-the-movie-director-says.html
These, in my estimation, would be the "bullet points" for fans:
1.) Setting IS WWII. It's an origin story for the Steve Rogers Cap.
2.)From the sounds of things the character is hewing VERY close to the standard model: Super-Soldier Program, innability to make "more" of him, Rogers as a "98 lbs weakling" before being transformed, etc.
3.) As to the costume: The way Johnston lays it out, he'll be wearing BOTH the traditional "classic" costume and a more armor-like outfit (presumably) closer to the "Ultimates" version. The logic behind this: The "classic" one is something the Army/Goverment puts him in to "show him off" in USO productions, he thinks it's dumb, then he comes to realize the tangible value of the "living symbol" aspect and fashions a combat-functional version.
Immediate reaction: I like it. No, wait... I don't just like it, I REALLY like it. I think this is sounds like a fucking great solution.
The costume was going to be THE big obstacle with this character, precisely because the whole "guy wearing a flag" concept is just patently ridiculous and people - especially those not already fans of the character or genre - are probably going to think it looks silly. That's why this angle strikes me as so brilliant: You'll have the main character basically "agreeing" with them that "this thing is stupid"... but then (it sounds like) a major point of his arc will be realizing (and communicating to the audience) "no, wait, it's actually AWESOME."
I'm feeling very good about this right now.










Post a Comment
Post a Comment